Skip to main content

Cityscape: Volume 14 Number 2 | Article 6

HUD.GOV HUDUser.gov

Moving to Opportunity

Volume 14 Number 2

Editors
Mark D. Shroder
Michelle P. Matuga

Making MTO Health Results More Relevant to Current Housing Policy: Next Steps

Thomas D. Cook, Northwestern University

Coady Wing, University of Illinois, Chicago


 

This article examines the Moving to Opportunity (MTO) for Fair Housing demonstration and concludes that it has limited relevance for understanding the effects of the federal Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program (Section 8 Program) for four reasons. First, MTO focused on a group of people who lived in public housing at the outset of the study, and this subpopulation represents a small fraction of the recipients of the Section 8 Program. Second, MTO improves neighborhood quality more, on average, than the Section 8 Program does. Third, MTO fails to activate a mechanism that often improves health and is central to the Section 8 Program. Fourth, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development could probably not bring MTO’s major treatment condition to scale because of the relative shortage of affordable rental units in affluent neighborhoods. Because MTO had its clearest effects in the health domain, this article briefly outlines a study of the health effects of the Section 8 Program.


Previous Article   |   Next Article

 

image of city buildings