Skip to main content

Cityscape: Volume 27 Number 1 | Family Self-Sufficiency Program Evaluation | Supporting Economic Mobility Through HUD’s Family Self-Sufficiency Program: Findings and Recommendations From the National Impact Evaluation

HUD.GOV HUDUser.gov

Family Self-Sufficiency Program Evaluation

Volume 27 Number 1

Editors
Alexander Din and Paul Joice
Michelle P. Matuga

Supporting Economic Mobility Through HUD’s Family Self-Sufficiency Program: Findings and Recommendations From the National Impact Evaluation

Nandita Verma
Joshua Vermette
MDRC


This article presents results from a national randomized controlled trial of the Family Self-Sufficiency (FSS) program, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) flagship initiative to support the economic mobility of households receiving federal housing assistance. This evaluation is the first national assessment of the effects of the FSS program, which the U.S. Congress has funded since the early 1990s and is operated by more than 700 housing agencies. The FSS program offers case coordination, employment and financial education-related services, and an escrow savings account to help participants make progress toward their economic self-sufficiency goals and build long-term savings. Eighteen housing agencies, selected to reflect the contexts in which the program operates, agreed to participate in the evaluation. Combined, these programs enrolled 2,656 households. The mixed-methods evaluation followed study participants for up to 7 years, beyond the full 5-year term of the program for most. It combined administrative records, repeated surveys, and interviews with program staff. The evaluation found that, relative to the control group, the FSS program markedly increased participation in employment services and financial management services but did not produce notable effects on a wide range of hypothesized outcomes. Both program and control groups shared similar trajectories on most outcomes, including employment, earnings, household income, indicators of material well-being, and housing subsidy receipt. Furthermore, only a small proportion of FSS participants in the study graduated and received an escrow disbursement. As a result, a significant majority of those who accrued escrow savings forfeited them. The results from this comprehensive study underscore the need to reimagine the program and strengthen its implementation, so it can serve as a platform to build and boost participants’ economic mobility.



Previous Article    |    Next Article

 

image of city buildings