The Advisory Board of Cityscape

Dolores Acevedo-Garcia

Dolores Acevedo-Garcia
Brandeis University


Ira Goldstein

Ira Goldstein, Ph.D.
The Reinvestment Fund


Richard K. Green

Richard K. Green
University of Southern California


Mark Joseph

Mark Joseph
Case Western Reserve University

Matthew E. Kahn

Matthew E. Kahn
University of California, Los Angeles


C. Theodore Koebel

C. Theodore Koebel, Ph.D.
Virginia Tech


Jens Ludwig

Jens Ludwig
University of Chicago


Mary Pattillo

Mary Pattillo
Northwestern University


Carolina Reid

Carolina Reid
University of California


Patrick Sharkey

Patrick Sharkey
New York University


symposium symposium

Current Issue | Past Issues


Double Issue
Volume 19, Number 3, 2017

Planning Livable Communities

Guest Editor's Introduction

HUD’s Sustainable Communities Initiative: An Emerging Model of Place-Based Federal Policy and Collaborative Capacity Building

Impacts of the Sustainable Communities Initiative on Regional Collaboration, Equity, and Planning: Results of a Survey of Grantee Regions

Civic Infrastructure and Sustainable Regional Planning: Insights From the Sustainable Communities Initiative Regional Planning Grantees

The Impacts of the Sustainable Communities Initiative Regional Planning Grants on Planning and Equity in Three Metropolitan Regions

The Impact of the Sustainable Communities Initiative on Engagement and Collaboration in Planning: Experiences From Four U.S. Regions

Planning Without Agency: Vibrant NEO 2040

Epistemic Communities or Forced Marriages? Evaluating Collaboration Among Sustainable Communities Initiative Regional Planning Grant Recipients

blue line

The Family Options Study

Guest Editors’ Introduction

International Commentary: Family Options Study Observations From the Periphery of Europe

International Commentary: The Implications of the Family Options Study for Family Homelessness in Australia

International Commentary: Eliminating Family Homelessness and the Family Options Study

U.S. Commentary: The Family Options Study and Family Well-Being Outcomes

U.S. Commentary: The Family Options Study and Food Insecurity

U.S. Commentary: Insights From the Family Options Study Regarding Housing and Intimate Partner Violence

U.S. Commentary: Implications From the Family Options Study for Homeless and Child Welfare Services

U.S. Commentary: Effects of Housing Subsidies on the Well-Being of Children and Their Families in the Family Options Study

Lessons for Conducting Experimental Evaluations in Complex Field Studies: Family Options Study

Mismatch Between Homeless Families and the Homelessness Service System

Risk Models for Returns to Housing Instability Among Families Experiencing Homelessness

Families’ Experiences of Doubling Up After Homelessness

Family Options Study: Effects on Family Living Situation

Family Options Study: How Homeless Families Use Housing Choice Vouchers

blue line


Data Shop: Residential Demographic Multipliers: Using Public Use Microdata Sample Records To Estimate Housing Development Impacts

Graphic Detail: Visualizing Residential Vacancy by Length of Vacancy

Impact: Instituting Smoke-Free Public Housing: An Economic Analysis

Policy Briefs: HOPE and Choice for HUD-Assisted Households

Evaluation Tradecraft: Real Estate Analysis as a Tool for Program Evaluation

Affordable Design: 2017 Innovation in Affordable Housing Student Design and Planning Competition: Woodhill Homes, Cleveland, Ohio

blue line

Request for Proposals: Competition To Conduct Analysis of HUD’s Randomized Evaluation Data

Correction: Bridging the Gap to Scalable Community Reinvestment Lending Programs

Correction: Community Reinvestment Act and Local Governance Contexts: Advancing the Future of Community Reinvestment?

Correction: The HECM Program in a Snapshot