Cityscape: Volume 25 Number 2 | Recent Reforms in Zoning | Upzoning With Strings Attached: Evidence From Seattle’s Affordable Housing Mandate

The goal of Cityscape is to bring high-quality original research on housing and community development issues to scholars, government officials, and practitioners. Cityscape is open to all relevant disciplines, including architecture, consumer research, demography, economics, engineering, ethnography, finance, geography, law, planning, political science, public policy, regional science, sociology, statistics, and urban studies.

Cityscape is published three times a year by the Office of Policy Development and Research (PD&R) of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

Cityscape Home  |  View Past Issues

Recent Reforms in Zoning

Volume 25 Number 2

Mark D. Shroder

Michelle P. Matuga

Upzoning With Strings Attached: Evidence From Seattle’s Affordable Housing Mandate

Jacob Krimmel
Federal Reserve Board

Betty Wang
University of Hong Kong

The views and analysis expressed here do not represent those of the Board of Governors or the Federal Reserve System.

This article analyzes the effects of a major municipal residential land use reform on new home construction and developer behavior. It examines Seattle’s Mandatory Housing Affordability (MHA) program, which relaxed zoning regulations while encouraging affordable housing construction in 33 neighborhoods in 2017 and 2019. The reforms allowed for more dense new development, or “upzoning,” but they also required developers to either reserve some units of each project at below market rates or pay into a citywide affordable housing fund. Using a difference-in-differences estimation comparing areas the reforms affected versus those not affected, the authors show that new construction fell in the upzoned, affordability-mandated census blocks. The quasi-experimental border design finds strong evidence of developers strategically siting projects away from MHA-zoned plots—despite their upzoning—and instead to nearby blocks and parcels not subject to the program’s affordability requirements. Lowrise multifamily and mixed-use development drive these effects. The findings speak to the mixed results of allowing for more density while simultaneously mandating affordable housing for the same project.