Cityscape: Volume 19 Number 3 | The Impact of the Sustainable Communities Initiative on Engagement and Collaboration in Planning: Experiences From Four U.S. Regions

The goal of Cityscape is to bring high-quality original research on housing and community development issues to scholars, government officials, and practitioners. Cityscape is open to all relevant disciplines, including architecture, consumer research, demography, economics, engineering, ethnography, finance, geography, law, planning, political science, public policy, regional science, sociology, statistics, and urban studies.

Cityscape is published three times a year by the Office of Policy Development and Research (PD&R) of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

Cityscape Home  |  View Past Issues

Planning Livable Communities

Volume 19, Number 3

Mark D. Shroder

Michelle P. Matuga

The Impact of the Sustainable Communities Initiative on Engagement and Collaboration in Planning: Experiences From Four U.S. Regions

Meghan Z. Gough
Virginia Commonwealth University

Jason Reece
The Ohio State University

In 2010 and 2011, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development awarded 74 Sustainable Communities Initiative Regional Planning Grant (SCI-RPG) program grants. The grants supported 3-year regional planning efforts that prioritized inclusive processes and addressed the interdependent challenges of economic prosperity, social equity, and environmental protection. This article examines the experiences of four 2010 SCI-RPG grantees, investigating the impact of the SCI-RPG program on public engagement and collaboration. Using survey data, interviews, and document analysis from these regions, we consider how SCI-RPG helped to break down silos between jurisdictions and organizations, and how it increased representation of underserved populations in planning decisions. We find that SCI-RPG successfully created greater awareness of the connections between the “three Es” of sustainability, increased interjurisdictional and cross-section collaborations, and generated more effective public engagement efforts. However, we question the potential for plan implementation and continuation of these outcomes. We conclude with implications for planning and policy, and we offer recommendations for future federal large-scale planning programs.