Header Image for Print

The goal of Cityscape is to bring high-quality original research on housing and community development issues to scholars, government officials, and practitioners. Cityscape is open to all relevant disciplines, including architecture, consumer research, demography, economics, engineering, ethnography, finance, geography, law, planning, political science, public policy, regional science, sociology, statistics, and urban studies.

Cityscape is published three times a year by the Office of Policy Development and Research (PD&R) of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.


 
  • Small Area Fair Market Rents
  • Volume 21 Number 3
  • Managing Editor: Mark D. Shroder
  • Associate Editor: Michelle P. Matuga
 

Impact of Expanded Choice on Attrition in the Housing Voucher Program

Judy Geyer
Samuel Dastrup
Meryl Finkel
Abt Associates Inc.


This paper examines whether expanding neighborhood choice by adding a more localized approach to setting the rental payment standard affects length-of-stay in the U.S. Housing Choice Voucher (HCV) program. Payment standards are typically constant within a metropolitan area, rather than small geographic areas such as ZIP Codes. Using data from the Small Area Fair Market Rent (SAFMR) Demonstration by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), we observed changes in program exit rates over time in housing agencies adopting ZIP-Code-based payment standards and compare these with changes in exit rates in programs that continued under metropolitan area-based standards. We expand the analysis by looking at subgroups, specifically households with children, seniors, adults with disabilities, and residents in lower, average, or higher rent neighborhoods. We find that the introduction of SAFMRs increased program attrition, with exit rates that imply about a 2-year reduction in the median length of program participation (from a base of about 11 years). Effects are largest among working-age adults and in households living in lower- and moderate-rent areas at the time of program introduction. We conclude with a discussion of how our findings on program attrition and housing independence inform recent proposals to adopt more flexible payment standards or increase public housing agencies (PHAs) authority to change payment standards under Moving to Work (MTW) authority.


Previous Article   |   Next Article


Periodicals: 



Note: Guidance documents, except when based on statutory or regulatory authority or law, do not have the force and effect of law and are not meant to bind the public in any way. Guidance documents are intended only to provide clarity to the public regarding existing requirements under the law or agency policies.